By Orlando Florin Rosu @ Adobe Stock
In The Wall Street Journal, Spencer Jakab discusses the benefits of a balanced portfolio for retirees who face sequence of return risk. You don’t want a bad year or two at the beginning of your retirement ruining the rest of it. The solution may be a balanced portfolio and a low withdrawal rate. Jakab writes:
Most commonly understood as a 60% allocation to the S&P 500 stock index and 40% to intermediate bonds like 10-year Treasury notes, the ratio and exact holdings aren’t set in stone. It is just shorthand for a mix that gets you the best return for the least choppiness, according to modern portfolio theory. But 2022’s swoon was a reminder that money can still be lost: It was a 60/40 portfolio’s worst year after inflation since 1974, a year before Vanguard was founded.
With the Federal Reserve regularly riding to the rescue over the past quarter century, investors had been conditioned to expect bonds to act like a shock absorber, buffering a bad year for stocks. That is actually pretty rare, though, according to a 200-year retrospective by Morgan Stanley Investment Management.
Ironically, the lower bond yields are when a stock swoon begins, the less potential bond prices have to rise in a sharp economic downturn. If a recession caused yields on 10-year Treasury notes to drop to 1.5% today then their price would rise by about a fifth. Back in 1974, a plunge to the same yield would have spurred a rise of around 50%.
To academics, those temporary paper gains, and just being diversified generally, make your portfolio safer. Do they really, though? Maybe, if it makes it less likely that a saver will panic when they open their 401(k) statement, torpedoing their nest egg.
But owning lots of bonds also means settling for lower returns–another form of risk. After all, $100 invested in the stock market in 1928 turned into $787,018 by the beginning of this year, more than 100 times as much as owning Treasury notes and 350 times as much as short-term Treasury bills. No less an investor than Warren Buffett has told the trustees of his will to invest 90% of his wife’s inheritance in a stock index fund and just 10% in short-term Treasury bills.
With all due respect to Buffett, there is another reason the less-aggressive 60/40 mix has become a touchstone for retirees: sequence of return risk. An especially bad run for markets around the time someone starts to draw down their savings can have an outsize effect on how much they have to live off. And the ultimate risk for a retiree is running out of money.
The seminal work on how to avoid that was published 30 years ago by adviser William Bengen, who popularized the 4% Rule. It says a retiree can withdraw that percentage of their portfolio in year one and then increase it by the inflation rate for the next 29 years with very little chance of penury.
That 4% rate is tied at the hip with a 60/40 mix, or thereabouts. Most retirement products these days improve on the traditional blend by including things like real estate and international stocks. Rules of thumb aren’t foolproof, though. Bengen’s 4% Rule is based on a mostly prosperous and peaceful period for America. Even so, a person retiring in 1966, ahead of a bear market and a spike in inflation, cut it very close.
A recent academic paper that looks at 38 developed countries’ experience over many decades says that a retiree who wants no more than one-in-20 odds of “financial ruin” should withdraw just 2.26% a year. Put another way, someone with a $1.5 million nest egg should take out $34,000 in their first year of retirement, not $60,000–a huge difference.
America isn’t Japan, Sweden, or Australia, but don’t assume that it will be as exceptional in the coming decades as past ones. Uncle Sam’s interest-rate bill alone will exceed a trillion dollars next fiscal year–more than all discretionary, nondefense spending. Ruling out higher taxes, higher inflation or less willingness by foreigners to finance Americans’ lifestyles is foolhardy.
Action Line: When you want to talk about building a balanced portfolio for your retirement, I’m here. In the meantime, click here to subscribe to my free monthly Survive & Thrive letter.
E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy
Latest posts by E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy (see all)
- September RAGE Gauge: Win Friends and Influence People - September 12, 2024
- A Word on the Trump/Harris Dystopian Debate - September 11, 2024
- The Trump Tax Reforms and Biden/Harris Inflation - September 11, 2024
- Businesses Eager to Invest in Sunbelt - September 11, 2024
- You’re Ignorant, Learn to Know the Answers - September 10, 2024
