Your Survival Guy

Preparing your investments and family for when disaster strikes.

Disclosure

  • Home
  • Your Survival
    • Special Report: FOOD SHORTAGE: Crazed Hoarding Is Not Preparing
    • Your Survival Guy’s Super States
    • Constitutional Carry
    • EMP Threat
    • Tucker Explains
    • Newport Gas Outage
    • Water
      • Emergency Water Storage
      • Let There Be Water
    • Get Your Gun and Your Training Now
    • Satellite Phones
    • Navy SEAL Survival Kit
  • Your Money
    • Coronavirus Infects Stock Market
    • Looking for a Better America
    • You Invest, They Win
    • Where to Keep Your Cash
    • Paris
    • How to Buy a Boat
    • Dead or Alive? The Future of Long-Term Investing
    • Is Vanguard too Big?
    • Cryptocosm and Life After Google
    • The Last Intelligence Report
    • The Truth Behind the S&P 500
    • RAGE Gauge
    • How Many “Retirees” Will Keep Working?
    • Your Retirement Life
    • You’ll Love This if You’re Dreaming of an Active Retirement Life
  • Weapons
    • Self Defense
    • Every Family Should Own at Least One Shotgun: Here Are Three
  • About Me
    • Your Survival Guy: “Life on Main Street Hasn’t Been This Hard in a While”
    • Preparing for Times Like These
    • My Videos/Pics
    • Music
      • RIP Neil Peart: You Will Always Be Remembered as a “Modern-Day Warrior”
    • Your Survival Guy: Make Your Bed and The Hero Code
  • You
    • Our Cabin on Kodiak, Alaska
    • If You Are in Pain, this May Help. It Helped Me.
    • How to Save for a Grandchild
    • FIRE! Financial Independence, Retire Early
    • Compound Interest
    • Arithmetic of Portfolio Losses
    • Maximum Portfolio Withdrawal Rate
    • An Efficient Frontier
    • Retirement Compounders
    • Counterbalanced Total Returns
  • Survive & Thrive
    • January 2023: Stacking Wood and Compounding Money
    • December 2022: Your Survival Guy Prefers Bombardier’s Global Express 7500
    • November 2022: Arriving in Style at Le Bristol Hotel, Paris
    • October 2022: Sink Your Teeth into These Bond Yields
    • September 2022: Do You Have the 7 Habits of Highly Effective People?
    • August 2022: “Watch This Boat off Our Stern,” My Dad Said “He’s Coming in HOT”
    • July 2022: MONEY TALKS: Your Survival Guy’s Best Service in Paris
    • June 2022: “I’ve Been with Richard Young for Over 30 Years Now”
    • May 2022: Survive “If You Fail to Plan, You Plan to Fail”
    • April 2022: Dream On! Fishing the Double Down in Key West
    • March 2022: Your Survival Guy Hears the Craziest Investing Stories
    • February 2022: Your Survival Guy’s 2022 Super States
    • January 2022: The Least Affordable Housing Market in the U.S.
    • December 2021: Listen Your Survival Guy is not “Mr. Peanut”
    • November 2021: Joe Biden is Weaponizing Your 401(k) Against You
    • October 2021: Time to Get Your Lazy Cash Off the Couch
    • September 2021: What’s Your Survival Guy Investing in Right Now?
    • August 2021: To Where Will You Flee?
    • July 2021: This Bubble’s Popped Baby
    • June 2021: Your Survival Guy’s Summer Job, Inflation & You
    • May 2021: You’re Telling Me Friends Ask You This Question
    • April 2021: Is There One Best Place in America for ‘Liberty Retirees?’
    • March 2021: America’s Growth Corridors
    • February 2021: Troops in D.C. & Your Authoritarian Virtual Panopticon
    • January 2021: Are You Ready for The Great Reset?
    • December 2020: Disaster Prep in Our Newport Bunker and Your Survival
    • November 2020: Election 2020 Edition: Stock Market is Predicting a Trump Win
    • October 2020: You Invest They Win, AGAIN
    • September 2020: Proud to be an American: Pro-Trump Parade Turns Rhode Island Red
    • August 2020: The Clock is Ticking: You Must Protect Your Family
    • July 2020: What Will Her Life Be Like Now?
    • June 2020: Your Survival Guy’s Home (and Money) Protection Plan
    • May 2020: Future Look at Covid-20, or the Next Deadly Virus
    • April 2020: Only Trump Saw the Risk in America’s Relationship with China
    • March 2020: Coronavirus Infects Stock Market
    • February 2020: Escape the City: Live Small, Cheap, and Safe in America
    • January 2020: Is Your Cash Safe? Probably not This Safe
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • Welcome

Trump, like Reagan, a Lincoln Republican on Trade

July 6, 2016 By E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy

Donald_Trump_by_Gage_Skidmore_5

Photo by Gage Skidmore

As you know, some of the best intelligence comes from unexpected places. Recently my client Khushro Ghandhi and I were talking about politics and the market. To say I get an education every time I speak with him would be an understatement, as you’ll soon see. One day, to make his point he said to me “E.J., believe me I know how the left thinks, I was one of them, I’m a reformed Marxist!” That got my attention. I love my conversations with Khushro because what he says is from his heart. He has learned his beliefs from personal inflection, studying, and not being afraid to question “the system.” Here Kushro explains how Donald Trump’s skepticism of the benefits of free trade may not be such a new idea in the Republican Party.

The American System

By Khushro Ghandhi

In a discussion with teachers of American History, the subject of teaching “protectionism” came up. I recommended Pat Buchanan’s book “The Great Betrayal” as the best popular book on the history of American trade policy I know. I myself became aware of this aspect of American history in the seventies well before Buchanan wrote the book, so I can say with some assurance that Buchanan presents the history fairly and is consistent with good scholarship on the matter, though it is certainly a work of advocacy.

When protectionism is discussed, the issue of the “Smoot-Hawley Tariff” usually arises, often described as being a cause of the Depression of the 1930s. Milton Friedman’s work in the 1950s largely laid that ghost to rest: Friedman pointed instead to failures at the Federal Reserve. In fact the U.S. was the most protectionist nation on earth during its period of greatest growth from 1792-1929.

Modern “conservatives” are mostly against protectionism or “neo-mercantilism” and for what they describe as “free trade.” Whatever one may think of the policy it is not “conservative” if by “conservative” is meant the traditional policy of the Republican Party and its predecessors, the Whig Party and the Federalist Party, all three of which were “protectionist.” As far as I can tell, the change on the part of conservatives from protectionism to free trade is first clear in the “new right” of Buckley and National Review in the 1950s, which on this issue at least, was decidedly NOT “conservative” in the sense of traditional Republican Party policy. The reason for the shift? Thinkers of that time, including Buchanan, were impressed with the problem of “big government” typified by Fascism, Communism and the New Deal. In looking back into the roots of American thought on central government they concluded that Jefferson rather than Hamilton had been right on this issue of the danger of centralized government (a point with which I have some sympathy). Consequently, they rejected the Hamilton, Clay, Lincoln tradition of the Republican Party as it had existed until 1930 and adopted a Jeffersonian point of view, which is dominant among conservatives to this day. The question is whether their difference with Hamilton on the dangers of central government should have been extended to the specific issue of tariffs, which practically defined Republican Party economic policy (which could be summarized as free enterprise, internal improvements and tariffs).

In the Nineteenth century the fundamental divide on economic policy was between free trade, which American Whigs called “the British System” and protectionism, which Whigs called “The American System.” The British system was epitomized by the writings of Malthus and Ricardo. The American system, tracing its roots to Adam Smith, was grounded in Alexander Hamilton’s famous “Report on Manufactures,” which he wrote as Washington’s Treasury Secretary and which became policy under Washington and Adams. Jefferson and Madison were initially for free trade (as was the South generally) but both later switched to a nationalist trade position (after the war of 1812). Protectionism was the policy especially of Henry Clay and Lincoln. Key economists in the U.S. who expanded on Hamilton’s writings were Matthew Carey, a Hamilton protégé, and his son Henry Carey who was an advisor to Pennsylvania Iron and Steel interests, who were in turn key to Lincoln’s election (Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address is focused on the tariff at least as much as slavery).

Carey’s work “The Harmony of Interests” (as opposed to the notion of Ricardo and Marx that classes had fundamentally antagonistic interests) is a great book and was extremely influential at the time. It is impossible to distil this work in a few sentences, but the premise is that the world is not one of diminishing resources (Malthus) but the opposite. The interests of industry and labor are ultimately identical in a national system based on protection. A protected market was essential to the growth of nascent industry (protected especially from the British) and to labor which in America was already the highest paid in the world and unprotected could not compete with the cheap European labor–a tariff was essential to put American labor on equal footing with foreign labor. Thus, the Whig and Republican parties, based on protection, were business labor alliance parties. The separation of business and labor into two parties did not become a fixed feature of our political life until FDR.

A young German immigrant, Friedrich Liszt, came to America and studied with Henry Carey. He returned to Germany and became the most influential economist in that country, becoming the mover behind the “Zollverein” or German customs union. Germany under an American inspired protection policy went from a relatively backward economy in the 1840s to become the near industrial equal of Britain by 1914. Japan also, under the Meiji Emperor, consciously modeled their economic policy after the protectionist “national system” of the United States, and went from a quasi-feudal economy in 1865 to defeating Russia in 1905 (turning former Samurai families like Honda, Mitsubishi and Toyota from warrior clans into industrial conglomerates). In all three cases, the U.S., Germany and Japan, the rates of growth achieved were unprecedented.

Whatever one thinks of Donald Trump otherwise, his position is the traditional Republican position on trade.

Which policy is best economically? Naturally, that question can’t be settled here. That a national policy can work is indisputable, as history shows. However, all major schools of economic thought in the post-World War II era believe that free trade is the optimal policy, and this is also a conclusion, a theoretical one, that we cannot possibly settle here. Still, “optimal” for them means optimal for the world economy, not for any one specific national sector. Modern economics, presenting itself as objective and scientific, no longer presents itself as “Political Economy” or “National Economy.” Along with their aspiration for an “objective scientific” status comes an internationalist perspective. Nations, borders and cultures play no role in their calculations by design. Economics is studied as a system of abstract relations between interchangeable people and parts. Even if in theory this is optimal for the world economy, it is quite indifferent to the parts of the world economy which may suffer in service of global optimization. Naturally, those parts may take this a bit more personally than abstract parts ought to, as we are seeing unfold across the western world today.

I will just note the following: in the long run the defining factor in economics is growth and it is hard to argue that trade does not enhance growth. In the short run however, economic models are based on scarcity and equilibrium. It was understood by Carey and Republicans in the nineteenth century that free trade meant lowering U.S. manufacturing output and wages, pure and simple, breaking the social contract between business and labor. Reverting to a simple model of equilibrium, if we have a tank of water divided by a gate, with two different levels of water in each half (wages), then lifting that gate will result in one tank with one water level. The lower will rise and the higher will fall. Supporters of trade restriction today will argue that is precisely what has happened respecting wage levels between the U.S. and China over the last twenty years, and that is what the policies of the Federalist, Whig and Republican parties were designed to avert.

Khushro

P.S. The question of Ronald Reagan’s thinking always comes up in debates among conservatives–a kind of “what would Ronald Reagan do” sort of thinking. Reagan, shaped very much by post- war conservative thought, campaigned as a free trader. However, once in office his administration when confronted with actual trade issues–auto, steel, electronics–split into two factions. On the one side “academic” or “free trade utopians”, and on the other the businessmen, who leaned protectionist. In the end Reagan became the most protectionist president since Hoover. Below is a link to a Cato Institute study of the Reagan record on trade. Note that Cato is libertarian and so is committed to a pure free trade position. The author of the study, pro-Reagan no doubt, complains that Reagan strayed from a pure free trade position, as indeed he did.

Khushro Ghandhi is a C.P.A. specializing in small business and a member of the Board of Directors of Saint Monica Academy, a private Catholic Classical academy. In the early seventies he was a Marxist; his view of Marxian economics was, unusually, opposed to “New Left” and Malthusian interpretations. Marx accepted the conclusions of David Ricardo that Capitalism ultimately lead to stifling “the productive forces” (growth) and concluded that capitalism had to be replaced by socialism for unfettered growth to occur. Ironically, it was studying Marx’s letters and articles in American newspapers that revealed a school of American economists opposed to Marx, Ricardo and Malthus–a school of economics seldom referred to in contemporary debates. After studying nineteenth century “American System” economists he concluded that capitalism as practiced in America was an unsurpassed engine of economic growth, and suffered from none of the “contradictions”  claimed by Ricardo and Marx. By 1980 he was a supporter of Ronald Reagan and a proponent of what would come to be called the “Strategic Defense Initiative.”

The following two tabs change content below.
  • Bio
  • Latest Posts
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Instagram profile

E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy

E.J. Smith is Founder of YourSurvivalGuy.com, Managing Director at Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd., a Managing Editor of Richardcyoung.com, and Editor-in-Chief of Youngresearch.com. His focus at all times is on preparing clients and readers for “Times Like These.” E.J. graduated from Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts, with a B.S. in finance and investments. In 1995, E.J. began his investment career at Fidelity Investments in Boston before joining Richard C. Young & Co., Ltd. in 1998. E.J. has trained at Sig Sauer Academy in Epping, NH. His first drum set was a 5-piece Slingerland with Zildjians. He grew-up worshiping Neil Peart (RIP) of the band Rush, and loves the song Tom Sawyer—the name of his family’s boat, a Grady-White Canyon 306. He grew up in Mattapoisett, MA, an idyllic small town on the water near Cape Cod. He spends time in Newport, RI and Bartlett, NH—both as far away from Wall Street as one could mentally get. The Newport office is on a quiet, tree lined street not far from the harbor and the log cabin in Bartlett, NH, the “Live Free or Die” state, sits on the edge of the White Mountain National Forest. He enjoys spending time in Key West and Paris. Please get in touch with E.J. at ejsmith@yoursurvivalguy.com To sign up for my free monthly Survive & Thrive letter, click here.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Instagram profile

Latest posts by E.J. Smith - Your Survival Guy (see all)

  • Tom Brady Retires, Again. Should You? - February 1, 2023
  • Reagan’s America Remembered by Your Survival Guy and More - February 1, 2023
  • America’s Unprecedented Debt Problem - February 1, 2023
  • What Kind of Life Are You Investing For? - January 31, 2023
  • Why Don’t These Mayors Seem to Care? - January 31, 2023

If you enjoyed this post, email it to a friend:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • WhatsApp

Related Posts

Money 101

Trending

  • 4 Life Changing Words for Your Survival Guy: “You Should Try This”
  • Invest with Peace of Mind and Comfort
  • LOSING POWER: Your Survival Guy's Nightmare Scenario
  • Welcome to Hotel California, Where You Can Never Leave
  • Your Survival Guy's 2022 Super States
  • The World Economic Forum's Record of Destruction
  • Stocks Go Up and Down: Get Paid Along the Way
  • America's Super States and Stocks that Respect YOU
  • Don't Let Your Lazy Cash Eat all Your Food
  • The Rich Seek More from Bank Accounts

Must Reads

  • BIDEN-FLATION: Here’s Why Prices Are Up At Your Favorite Restaurant
  • FIRE AND ICE: Defeat the Cold by Stocking Firewood
  • Why Mutual Funds and ETFs No Longer Work
  • Your Job as an Investor Is Not What You Think
  • Investment Advice: Sticking with the Four-Year-Olds
  • Bad Guy with a Gun STOPPED by Good Woman with a Gun
  • GET PAID: How To Invest in Biden’s Inflationary Market
  • Your Survival Guy’s 2022 Super States: #1 New Hampshire
  • Will the Russian-Ukrainian War Go Nuclear?
  • Americans Fleeing High Tax States for Growth Corridors
Only if You’re Serious
Crazed Hoarding Is not Preparing
How to Save Rainwater Effectively
Your Survival Guy in Paris
Your Survival Guy's Fishing Stories
Financial Independence, Retire Early
Money 101
Pandemic Creates Virtual Panopticon
Emergency Water Storage
Find Freedom in America
Second Amendment
How Can You Save Money for Your Grandchild
Great Reset
See Who's Missing the Boat
Richard  Young Reports
How You Can Save Money for Your Grandchild
Why Fidelity is Number One
The Best States for Survival
You Invest, They Win
Escape the City
Why Vanguard is Too Big for YOU
Island Life

Copyright © 2023 | Terms & Conditions

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.